Outcome of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutated and Non Mutated Adenocarcinoma Lung to Standard Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Asian patients with adenocarcinoma of lung have higher incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations which predict increased response and survival in patients to oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study was conducted to study the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in patients in Nepal and compare the outcome in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated versus non-mutated patients receiving standard therapy. METHODS: This is an observational study conducted among newly diagnosed patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of lung in Bir Hospital from April 2017 to June 2018. Demographic and clinical data collection along with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing was done. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations received Gefitinib while non-mutated patients received systemic chemotherapy. Response evaluation, progression free survival at 1 year, objective response rate and quality of life were compared. Follow up period was for 1 year. RESULTS: Eighty three (33%, n=253) patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the lung with mean age at diagnosis being 59.4 years. epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were found in 29% patients. Complete response was achieved in 9.1% vs 3.0 % (p=0.46), objective response rate was 27.3% versus 15.2% (p=0.23), progression free survival at 1 year was 39% vs 27%, (p = 0.29) and mean score of global health status was 68.1 versus 61.6 in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated versus non-mutated (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung was lower than in Eastern Asian studies, but higher than in western populations. epidermal growth factor receptor mutated patients had improved survival, better treatment response and quality of life in comparison with non-mutated.

Malnutrition among Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Malnutrition is one of the most frequent disorders among cancer patients. It is seen in 50-90% of cancer patients. This high prevalence of malnutrition is very concerning as it is associated with reduced effective treatment, functional status, quality of life and survival. The aim of the study was to find out the prevalence of malnutrition among cancer patients in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 95 cancer patients in the Department of Clinical Oncology of a tertiary care centre from 25 January 2022 to 25 July 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 1192/2078/79). Convenience sampling was done. Patients were screened using Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment for malnutrition. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 95 cancer patients, 22 (23.15%) (15.10-32.90, 95% Confidence Interval) were malnourished. Conclusions: The prevalence of malnutrition was found to be lower than in other studies done in similar settings. Nutritional assessment and support should be an integral part of care for gastrointestinal cancer. Keywords: malnourishment; nutritional deficiency; screening.

Reliance on Self-Medication Increase Delays in Diagnosis and Management of GI Cancers: Results From Nepal.

PURPOSE: Patients with GI cancers in Nepal often present with advanced disease and poor outcomes. The purpose of the study was to determine the time to presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of GI cancer and the baseline factors that may be associated with delays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved study was performed in Kathmandu, Nepal, from July 2018 to June 2019. Patients with newly diagnosed GI cancers were asked to fill out a standardized questionnaire. Baseline factors such as residence, literacy, and use of self-medication were recorded. Patients were asked to report the time from first symptom to presentation, time from primary care visit to pathologic diagnosis, and time from diagnosis to surgery and/or treatment. Baseline factors were analyzed using 2-tailed t tests (Prism 8.0; GraphPad, La Jolla, CA) to determine whether any factors were associated with longer time delays in these 3 intervals. RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 104 patients with a median age of 53.5 years (range, 22-77 years); 61.5% were men, 46.2% had upper GI cancers, and 83.7% presented with stage III or IV disease. The median time to presentation was 150 days, time to diagnosis was 220 days, and time to treatment was 50 days. There was no statistically significant difference in time intervals between upper and lower GI cancers. Use of self-medication (88.5%) was the only factor associated with longer time intervals to presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients in Nepal have long time intervals to presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of GI cancer. Self-medication led to longer delays. Reasons for self-medication and other potential barriers will be explored in future studies in the hopes of improving outcomes.

Incidence and attributes of chemotherapy induced myelotoxicity, anemia and neutropenia in adults with cancer in Nepal: A cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Myelosuppression remains a major toxicity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality and cost. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the prevalence and incidence of myelotoxicity, anemia and neutropenia in the adult cancer population, and further to determine the factors influencing them. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted at National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu. A total of 170 subjects eligible for the study were enrolled for analysis. Prevalence and incidence of myelotoxicity anemia, neutropenia and myelotoxicity at enrollment and during study were investigated. Factors influencing development of myelotoxic event were determined. RESULTS: Of 170 enrolled patients, the prevalence of myelotoxicity, anemia and neutropenia at enrolment was 54 (31.8%), 20 (11.8%) and 28 (16.6%), respectively, with 27 (16%) mild and 12 (7.1%) moderate type of anemia. Incidence of myelotoxicity, anemia and neutropenia during treatment was 90 (52.94%), 44 (26%) and 53 (31.2%) respectively, with 70 (41.2%) mild, 39 (22.9%) moderate and 5 (2.9%) severe type of anemia. Age (OR: 0.49; p < 0.047), and baseline Hb (OR: 1.29; p < 0.01) were found to be independent predictors associated with anemia. Hb (OR: 2.42, CI: 1.79-3.28; p < 0.001) and smoking (OR: 0.49: p = 0.03) were found to be independent factors associated myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed a high incidence rate of myelotoxicity, neutropenia and anemia in a considerable number of Nepalese cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and that baseline Hb, smoker and older adults are at more risk, these patients should be evaluated carefully and a prophylactic measure should be adopted accordingly so as to prevent toxicity and improve quality of life during cancer treatment.